Basically, every time you want to use a bad word, you replace it with the name of a censorious corporation that cares nothing for America. Sound easy?
Why bother though?
Google has decided it is going to censor search results from naughty words (Why are you still using Google when DuckDuckGo doesn’t track your data?). YouTube has been doing this for a while. Twitter does it. Facebook does it.
Here’s the legend for Operation Google, according to the 4chan post:
Honsestly, we need to work in some better legend words. How about slurs for Facebook? What about Twitter?
Update: there are some additions made to the legend:
The point it, make your freak flag fly and spew racially charged garbage; just remember to censor yourself with a member of the church of Silicon Valley.
At 22:09 on Wednesday, June 24, an anon posted this thread on 4Chan.
That anon is also the anonymous admin of this blog.
I don’t care about taking the credit (well maybe a little) for uncovering what might be a critical piece of information for the upcoming election: that presidential front-runner Joe Biden is not only related, but directly descended from, and named after, several prominent slave owning individuals in Maryland. How has this information has been sitting out in the open in public archived census data without a single person uncovering it? It seems suspicious that a family tree created in 2010 on Geni.com did not lead to the uncovering of this information for another decade.
I give Snopes credit only for framing this article within hours of the original /pol/ thread as misdirecting the facts: that it was Joe Biden’s grandmother Mary Biden (maiden name Robinette) whom descended from the Robinette slave owners in Maryland.
As a reasonable person, I don’t believe that an individuals’ ancestry determines the legitimacy of them as a person. However, the radical left does, in fact, believe that ancestry plays an extensive role. The theory of intersectionalism begins and ends with the ideas that white oppressors have prejudice towards other races in varying amounts because of past subjugation of cultures seen as lesser by white folks. Those who profited off the slave trade are the worst: white Americans who built their agricultural economy with slave labor and subjugated Chinese immigrants to construct railroads at great cost to their own people. These beliefs have pushed the radical left to tear down statues of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and call for the removal of the Emancipation Proclamation statue in Washington D.C.; one that literally portrays Abraham Lincoln breaking the chains from a slave; a statue paid for by blacks and commissioned by Frederick Douglass himself.
Thus, the radical left’s presidential candidate of choice should be free of all forms of racism, even those by proxy. But is he?
The answer is a very resounding “no.”
Joe Robinette Biden, Jr, is the son of a man with the same name, and the grandson of Joseph H. Biden. Joseph H married Mary A. Robinette, daughter of George Robinette and Mary Hanafee. View full tree here (screenshot). George is the son of Moses and the grandson of Jessie (Jesse).
Jesse Robinette, for which there are 2 entries in the 1830 Maryland census, owned either 7 or 16 slaves. Here is the 16 slave entry:
Rebel News shortly posted an article with the 7 slave entry. If either are true, it is damning. But is there also a possibility that they are the same Jesse? It appears that they are both spelled in a funky way: Jefse. In 18th Century English the long s or double s was styled as a tall f. I am no historian, but using my understanding of German, this would actually reduce to Jessse. Correct me if I’m wrong, but what are the chances that two different men with the name Jesse misspelled their own name in the same way in a rural colony of early Maryland with a unique name such as Robinette? I looked through the family tree and found no other Jesse Robinettes. This intrigues me.
This estate record indicates the relationships of these people in the family tree:
And this estate record (page 22) indicates that Jesse Robinette, the one married to Dorcas Robinette, owned not 16 but 17 slaves. Each of them named in the top of the first column:
Basically, the Robinettes owned slaves. And Snopes can suck a fat one.
Now, does this reflect on Biden at all? I implore you to take a look at the following headline:
And watch the CNN clip of Biden’s thoughts about the use of school buses to desegregate schools:
And finally, watch the following CSPAN clip from 1985 where Biden reads the n-word from a memo without pausing:
That last one may have been a bit petty; but the point is this: where is the outcry about how Biden literally did these things? Where is the outcry that Biden is the descendant of a prominent enslavement family in Maryland, and that he takes his middle name, Robinette, from them?
As long as you can be a useful idiot to their cause, these people do not care about what their candidate actually stands for. Joe Biden is a shell of a candidate. He stands for nothing. This means that the radical left does not vote on principle but rather on the simple platform of defeat Donald Trump. Folks like me have known this for a while.
As you look around you and see what is happening to our monuments and our universities, do you really believe that this election is just about who gets to be president? This election is the attempted coup de gras by a radical group of leftists. These leftists have spent decades infiltrating the university system, spending billions in taxpayer money to indoctrinate our young up-and-coming skilled workers into the ideology of intersectionality. Many of those not participating in these riots are still prone to the lens of intersectionality, and more are sympathetic to their cause. Even more sit back and do nothing.
Joe Biden is a vessel for their anger. They may have planned to get him into power, then prove that he is a racist using this information, and forced him to resign, leaving his yet-to-decide Vice President to take over. Or maybe they planned that one of us internet sleuths would find this and plaster it on the internet organically so that when the primaries are over they can replace Biden as the nominee at the convention in an even worse flipping of their own base than 2016’s tyrannous collusion of chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hillary Clinton.
It doesn’t matter now. We know. Snopes is already trying to cover it up.
Are you going to let them tear down our culture’s monuments to freedom of speech, slave abolition, democracy, and presidency over monarchy? Are you going to let them ban our books and movies and TV?
If they do, they’d better tear down this old relic with them.